Defoe’s classic translates surprisingly well to outer space in this 1960s gem
While researching Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, I came across an article attacking a variety of enjoyable Crusoe characterizations and claiming bitterly that one group has veered to the “comic-parodic” like Gilligan’s Island, while the other has maintained its “serious-academic” course.1 The author calls spin-offs of the classic “travesties,” particularly Robinson Crusoe on Mars, and it is here that his criticism takes a rather misguided turn. He describes the 1964 film as one starring “Dick van Dyke as an astronaut stranded on Mars, where he experiences numerous funny misadventures,” and, unfortunately, this is factually incorrect. Dick van Dyke starred in a similar film, Lt. Robin Crusoe (1966), which took place on an Earth-bound island; however, Robinson Crusoe on Mars is actually a thoughtful updating of Defoe’s original, transplanting our hero’s 18th century wanderlust efficiently to American dreams of space travel in the 1960s.
The sad truth is that Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe is, for a modern audience, not a terribly interesting novel. There are a couple of now standard-fare adventures, the requisite shipwreck, and the arrival of Friday, but for the most part, not much happens over the course of many years and many pages. The retellings, from television’s Lost in Space and the reality show Survivor to the critically acclaimed Tom Hanks film Cast Away (2000) are much more captivating, as is Robinson Crusoe on Mars. This underrated film stars Paul Mantee as Christopher “Kit” Draper, an American Navy astronaut who becomes stranded on Mars for an extended period of time.2 He is our modern Robinson Crusoe. There is no rollicking slapstick, and there are no funny misadventures. The update, written by Ib Melchoir and John C. Higgins and directed by Byron Haskin, moves at a reasonably brisk pace, and Mantee acquits himself nicely in a role that predates Tom Hanks’ stranded Federal Express worker. For the record, Paramount Pictures produced this minor science fiction classic, not Disney. There is a monkey (named Mona), but even it is not used for great comic effect. Monkeys were used by NASA in space flight, after all, and so it even adds to the film’s attempted verisimilitude.
Just as Defoe’s Crusoe serves as a mirror for 17th and 18th century British politics, so this stranded American astronaut reflects contemporary American politics. At the time of this film’s release in 1964, the Cuban Missile Crisis had been narrowly averted, the United States was entering the initial stages of the Vietnam War, President Kennedy had been publicly assassinated, and civil rights and segregation issues were a focal point for internal dissention. The Berlin Wall had been constructed, the Iron Curtain had been drawn, and the Cold War was icily escalating. In the midst of this nation-and-worldwide turmoil, we were also looking hopefully – and warily – towards outer space, an area that had already been “invaded” by the Russian satellite Sputnik in 1957. The space race was on, both in reality and in our imaginations. The popular image of President John F. Kennedy was perhaps as vital to this film as that of King William was for Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. The Cuban Missile Crisis was, in its own way, a 20th-century version of a Glorious Revolution, and Kennedy, the first Catholic elected to the presidency, stood as a new figure of tolerance and hope. A former Navy officer himself, he ushered in a desire to look towards the stars:
“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of preeminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war.” (Fromhttp://www.jfklibrary.org/jfkquote.htm, a site sponsored by the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library. Original quotation from address at Rice University in Houston, Texas, September 12, 1962.)
Robinson Crusoe on Mars encourages the viewer to face issues that are as relevant today as they were in the 1960s: propaganda, war, and discrimination. Transforming the hero into a Navy astronaut is a natural updating, allowing the figure to remain focused on exploration and adventure. In this film, our world has long been colonized, and other planets are clearly the next frontier. As a representative of the armed forces, Draper would appear to embody an even more clearly defined national agenda than Defoe’s Crusoe. Draper’s nickname, Kit, suggests a programmed hero who has been given the resources to succeed, but who will still have to figure out exactly how to assemble them to complete himself. To that end, he looks the part of the American hero throughout the film. He is shown shaving while stranded, and his hair never grows beyond its acceptable military length.. He is tall, dark, and ruggedly handsome, clearly equipped to handle the physical demands of his duties. He finds a cave and transforms it into a quasi-base camp marked by an American flag at the entrance — five years before Neil Armstrong would plant a flag after taking his giant leap for mankind.
For a soldier (of sorts), Draper is particularly non-violent and remarkably introspective. Like Crusoe he has a gun — and not a space-age ray gun as in the film poster, but merely a simple pistol — which he draws on two occasions but, unlike Crusoe, does not fire. No doubt, a futuristic laser gun could have been used as a more appropriate prop, so the question arises: Why would this anachronistic weapon have been used instead? The weapon certainly gets the viewer’s attention, as it appears so out of place. When we look at this pistol, however, our first thought is that it will be of no significant value in this otherworld, and perhaps that is the point. The weapons we are using in foreign struggles and domestic race wars of the sixties signify impotence — we are fighting a losing battle through violent warfare. Draper draws his gun the first time to investigate a noise revealed to be only the wind; the second time, he sees only the tail of the monkey, Mona, who has crash-landed in a separate pod, and he reacts reflexively. He quickly puts the gun away and runs to the apprehensive monkey, dressed in its own little — notably red — astronaut uniform. His first words to Mona subtly reflect the fears and hopes of the time: “Come on now, let’s not start a war.” They do not speak the same language (which Draper will lament later, stating, “If you just had four words, just four that you understood — yes, no, come, go — that’s all, we could talk to each other.”), but they are both trapped on the same planet, and they will depend on each other to survive.
Perhaps even more than in Defoe’s time, distinguishing friend from foe was considered a necessary if futile effort in the fifties and sixties. McCarthyism showed a very dark side of us, a side that would not trust based upon appearance nor assumed friendship (famously depicted in the 1956 film Invasion of the Body Snatchers). As time wears on, Draper becomes increasingly paranoid and removes all trace of his — and America’s — presence until he spies spacecraft in the distance. Hoping that they are rescue ships, he rushes out to them, only to discover that they are an alien race using slaves to mine for ore. The faces of these aliens are not shown, and their ships hover above shooting lasers like so many whip lashings upon the slaves, including Friday. In a change from the original tale, Friday is not really rescued by Draper; rather, he makes his escape concomitantly with Draper. This change is significant as it establishes from the outset that Friday can take care of himself.
The wariness with which Draper and Mona welcome Friday reflects the caution, mistrust, and xenophobia that many would have felt during the era, and these feelings give the film additional significance when viewed today. Friday looks human, but he does not talk at first. Draper is perplexed that he does not need to inhale from any type of oxygen tank, and he later learns that Friday takes small red pills that allow him to do without. When Mona reacts violently upon seeing him, Draper reprimands, “Mona, shut up. First visitor we’ve ever had, and you act like a gorilla.” The possible wordplay of gorilla/guerilla is underscored by Draper’s own concerns: “Where do you come from and how are you like us? And how are you different?” Draper has brought a stranger onto his home base, and for all he knows, he could be an enemy. At a time when we were examining our own race relations so closely, discovering our similarities and protecting ourselves against differences was a topical, relatable theme — and it is a theme that has increased relevance in our own world of quick-changing political alliances. It is not surprising that Draper initially warns Friday, “Me, I’m the boss and remember that. You get out of line just one iota, and I’ll bring your enemies right back into this cave.” As the old saying goes, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
The first and only direct reference to Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe arises as Draper warms up to the as-yet-unnamed Friday, and determines, “Come on, Joe, or whatever your name is. Friday, that’s it, with apologies to Robinson Crusoe.” He is delighted to discover that Friday is not mute, and he decides to teach him English. It is clear, however, that Friday has his own distinct language, and he tries to teach Draper as well, if a bit less forcefully. Their relationship, in fact, subverts the master/slave theme of Defoe’s tale and focuses instead on their growing friendship. When a meteor explodes above, covering them in ash, Friday rescues his partner and carries the unconscious Draper to safety. When Draper recovers, he thanks Friday and says something in Friday’s own tongue (and incomprehensible to the audience), seemingly along the lines of “I’m an idiot.” Draper’s willingness to learn at least some of Friday’s language is a compelling shift from the original tale, and allows us an American hero who does not merely shill nationalistic propaganda. Draper truly does not want Friday to become an imitation of himself, and he finally asks Friday, “But don’t just copy me. You tell me something. Tell me what’s inside you. Tell me, ah, for instance, where do you live? What planet? Where’s your home?” The two stare into the sky and point to their own home planets, with Draper finally commenting that he lives “just around the corner.” It is not just the world, but the universe that is becoming smaller.
Another significant reference is made to race relations and the history of slavery in America when Friday and Draper are forced into underground tunnels by the aliens. Friday has been tagged with metal cuffs on both hands that also serve as locators for the aliens. While underground, Draper works to remove these symbols of pain and servitude. Friday draws a picture of the Martian canal system for Draper to show that they can travel a great distance free from view, and Draper declares, “They’ll be our underground highway, our bomb shelter. And somewhere we’ll come out again and make a new home. What’s been done before can be done again.” This overt allusion to the Underground Railroad used by escaped slaves during colonial times suggests that, even in the far future, there will be a need to escape racism, xenophobia, and, in the worst case scenario, slavery.
Among the most analyzed passages of Defoe’s work are those sections that deal with Crusoe’s crusade to convert Friday. Although religious themes could have easily been excised from the film, they are addressed both metaphorically and directly. The planet itself is essentially a desert, and Friday greatly resembles a Philistine slave (in the images presented by Cecil B. Demille at any rate). After being rescued by Friday, Draper recites the Lord’s Prayer as they make their way back to the cave. As the film progresses, the viewer realizes that Friday takes on, whether purposefully or not, a religious significance akin to a Martian Moses who will lead Draper through a desert, a kind of valley of the shadow of death (keeping in mind that the film was shot on location in Death Valley). According to Psalm 23, “The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want. / He makes me lie down in green pastures;/ he leads me beside still waters; he restores my soul. / He leads me in right paths for his name’s sake.” In a remarkable inverse of Defoe’s tale, Friday becomes Draper’s shepherd. On their journey through the tunnels, they are forced upward by an unexpected fiery core, and they decide to travel over the desert towards the polar ice cap. Friday determines when they walk and when they rest, and he secretly saves his oxygen pills for Draper, essentially restoring his partner’s soul at the potential loss of his own life. And it is Friday who ultimately leads Draper along the right ethical paths, building friendship and trust in an otherwise hopeless environment. By the film’s conclusion, when oxygen is instantly released from the melting ice cap and a rescue ship suddenly appears, Draper is ready to return not with his man, but rather with his companion, Friday.3
- Cope, Kevin L. “All Aboard the Ark of Possibility; or Robinson Crusoe Returns from Mars as a Small-Footprint, Multi-Channel Interdeterminacy Machine.” Studies in the Novel 30.2 (1998): 150-163. [↩]
- I transcribed subsequent quotations from a videotape of Robinson Crusoe on Mars. [↩]
- The film Total Recall (1990), written by Gary Goldman and Dan O’Bannon, directed by Paul Verhoeven, and starring Arnold Schwarzenegger as the hero trapped on Mars ends in a strikingly similar manner, with the polar ice cap melting just in time to provide oxygen to the entire planet. [↩]
[…] take on the movie. I don't agree with everything the author says, but it's a good read. Patriotism, Politics, and Propaganda: The Naturalization of Friday's Man, Robinson, in Robinson Crus… __________________ I always take […]
Dear Mr. Rankin, I found your review of the film “Robinson Crusoe on Mars” to be quite illuminating and optimistic.
As a boy I watched “Robinson Crusoe on Mars” when it first came to television (our set was black & white) sometime during the late Sixties, or very early Seventies. I remember quite vividly, and with easily recalled emotions, that I experienced a strong feeling of hope, and a sense of exhilaration, even, at the film’s triumphant ending. I had never seen a science fiction film that had such an uplifting tone and positive outlook about the future. Aliens were always invaders.
What I was too young to comprehend at the time, and what your review so plainly affirms, is that the film’s exuberant (for me) storytelling style and progressive treatment of its subject matter was (obviously?) the result of the filmmakers’ studied reflections on the political, social, and scientific realities of the times in which the film was produced.
Now, as an adult, while it is disappointing to observe within the film’s futuristic setting that skin color — especially when it’s dark – STILL pre-emptively dooms an entire alien “race” to slavery, nonetheless it seems abundantly clear to me that the director and the writers intended to link the film’s drama to topical issues of the day, especially when you take note of how quickly a so-called “white” character such as astronaut Draper backs off of his “me, boss — you, slave” attitude and embraces brown-skinned Friday as a valued partner in survival, as an “equal,” as a person endowed with his own uniquely spiritual connection to the cosmos, and as I believe you pointed out, a bit of a savior! I didn’t see another science fiction film that dealt with an encounter between earthlings and “aliens”, and that possessed as much sensitivity towards the subject as “Robinson Crusoe on Mars” did, until 20th Century Fox released “Enemy Mine” in 1985. (I consider “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” to be a fairy tale, not science-fiction.)
The last thing I’d like to say, is that I compose music, and I believe that the composer of the film’s musical score, Nathan Van Cleave, responded to the uncommonly intimate (for a science fiction film) — and interpersonally challenging nature of the characters’ interactions, with an ear-opening and truly heartfelt degree of empathy, particularly in the exhilarating finale/end title cue that closes the film.
That cue is as thrilling as an anthem in the way that it celebrates not only Friday’s and Draper’s rescue from the planet Mars, but also the sense of brotherhood that has developed between them — but there’s even more. By setting up in the score such transcendent expectations for the future of intergalactic relations, the music also announced with great fanfare (and with equally serene spiritual assurance, too) the arrival of an era of space exploration that could be free of the kind of xenophobic “fear of the other,” “us” versus “them,” “War of the Worlds” type of attitude that characterizes so, so many films about first contact with extraterrestrials, and that also has had such brutally destructive and divisive consequences on the peoples that inhabit this planet Earth.
Thanks for your attention, Mr. Rankin, and thank you also for seeing so deeply into the socio-political subtexts of the film, “Robinson Crusoe on Mars.”
LOREN SPAIN