Jordan’s collage films are “moving” in two senses
“Animation” connotes many things to us jaded moderns – Bugs Bunny and variants, the dreaded Disney and its hellspawn, Spike and Mike and South Park with their “naughty bits,” and outré confections like the work of the Brothers Quay or The City of Lost Children. But animation has been around as long as movies, and in as many forms. One of its innovators is Lawrence Jordan, whose 40-film career was nicely distilled into 13 representatives shorts and features to honor his retirement (in May 1999) from teaching at the SF Art Institute.
Jordan (born 1933) came to San Francisco in the mid-1950s, after having established a minor reputation for his underground films in the style of his friend Stan Brakhage. His imagination was apparently better served by animation, judging from the evidence on display at this retrospective, and by 1961 he was doing innovative work in the genre. His reputation was made by early films like Duo Concertantes, which were “moving collages” that recalled the work of Max Ernst and Jess in using cut-outs from old magazines and books. Jordan’s aim was to create what he called “unknown worlds and landscapes of the mind,” and his approach was meticulous, painstakingly creating bizarre juxtapositions and forcing his two-dimensional cut-outs into a strangely seductive pantomime of life.
As random as such images sound, there’s a subtle sense of purpose. One of the subtexts is Jordan’s sweet satire of the Academy. Much of the imagery is classical – cut-outs of Greek statues, medieval motifs, drawings from old medical texts – but Jordan can’t resist bringing these seemingly noble images to scintillating life. Every still life (and there are many) becomes a screaming tableaux vivant through the filmmaker’s zany juxtapositions, sudden zooms back and forth, and literal deconstruction of his objects, which break into pieces at random and float charmingly through the scene.
The medieval obsession with creating life is also the subject of much of the film’s whimsical attention. Characters suddenly radiate the medieval “essential salts” they were thought to be made of during medieval times, or collapse entirely into this source material. Jordan even introduces a Paracelsus-like character who engages in stare-down contests with the aforementioned forlorn balloon. Jordan’s foregrounding of these absurdist pas-de-deux to classical backdrops – engravings of Victorian gardens, classical landscapes – keep his theme of the attack on the Academy and, for that matter, history and science feather-light and wonderfully engaging.
Jordan also has returned throughout his career to the live-action film, several examples of which are being shown. His three-part tribute to H. D. (Hilda Doolittle), which took four years to make (1990-93), is an ambitious and mostly successful attempt to visualize the mood of H. D.’s long poem Hermetic Definition. The Old House, Passing (1967) is a ghost story with some stunningly beautiful imagery, most notably a lyrical sequence of a woman blowing bubbles in a cemetery. Less demanding but typical of Jordan’s work in a more abbreviated format is the seven-minute Visions of a City (1957), a gorgeously evocative record of a confused Everyman (famed poet Michael McClure) trying to navigate a city (San Francisco) seemingly made entirely of reflective surfaces.