actor profiles

animation

book reviews

director profiles

documentaries

experimental &
avant garde


exploitation

film festivals

film noir

film reviews

gay & lesbian

hong kong films

horror

interviews

japanese cinema

music & musicals

silent film

tranny cinema
 
- - - - - -
To be automatically notified when the next issue is posted, join our mailing list.

 

home | current issue | archives | search | about us | contact | donate | blog | links

Spider-Man
Spider-Man
There's No 'There' There

Why Tobey Maguire has us by the testicles
and why he isn’t going to let go

Whence Spider-Man? Whence, indeed, and whither?

It has come to pass in these United States that you can spend $100 million making a film that has no more flavor than a glass of warm tap water and sell it for $1 billion. Spider-Man lacks the gee-whiz impact of the original Star Wars; the campy atmospherics of Batman; the in-your-face stupidity of Independence Day, Armageddon, and Twister; the hokey romance of Titanic; and even the ponderous self-indulgence of The Phantom Menace. In fact, it lacks everything.

Spider-Man

Spider-Man is nothing more or less than a flat-footed retelling of the story of "Spiderman," as set forth in the 1962 comic book. Nothing has been added, and nothing has been taken away, with the possible exception of Kirsten Dunst’s nipples, which are on screen for approximately two seconds.1

The original comic book was composed exclusively of clichés stolen from the Superman comic books, which began in 1939, and the film Spider-Man preserves these clichés with scrupulous care.2 Today’s filmgoers are paying good money to see story lines that were retro to their grandparents. To call Spider-Man formulaic is an insult to infants. A babe wet from the womb would find this pap unadventurous.

Spider-ManWhere will it all end? Obviously, it isn’t going to. Aggressively stupid films like The Mummy, The Mummy Returns, and The Scorpion King all did huge box office. Spider-Man will easily gross more than all three combined for no reason other than that it is more inoffensive.

The inoffensive blockbuster! A film without any ideas at all! This is Hollywood’s masterpiece!

NOTES

1. For this relief, much thanks. Perhaps in the sequel we can see them for three seconds.

2. So does the current Spiderman comic strip. Peter Parker has just gotten the same cub photographer job he got in 1962, and he runs around 2002 Manhattan taking pictures of warehouse fires.

August 2002 | Issue 37
Copyright © 2002 by Alan Vanneman

ALSO: More film reviews

Follow us on:

blog advertising is good for you

blog advertising is good for you

 


New book from the
editor and writers of
Bright Lights Film Journal

Action! Interviews with Directors
from Classical Hollywood to
Contemporary Iran

(Anthem Art and Culture),
by Gary Morris (Editor),
Bert Cardullo (Introduction),
Jonathan Rosenbaum (Foreword).
London and New York:
Anthem Press, 2009.

"I dare anyone to squeeze between
two covers a more varied, useful and
flat out entertaining sampling of
the personalities that make the
seventh art the liveliest."
— David Hudson, IFC.com

Interviews
Robert Bresson
Roger Corman (with Bruce Dern
  and David Carradine)
Allan Dwan
Clint Eastwood
Douglas Sirk
Robert Wise
Mania Akbari
Lars von Trier
Michael Haneke
Allie Light
Melvin and Mario van Peebles
Otto Muehl
The Brothers Quay
Barbara Kopple
Federico Fellini
Abbas Kiarostami
François Truffaut
Caveh Zahedi
Peter Bogdanovich and
  Joseph McBride
  on Orson Welles

Order now at Amazon.